Empressite Diffraction data computed using the structure from the paper listed below, along with the cell parameters refined from the powder pattern for R200013 Bindi L, Spry P G, Cipriani C American Mineralogist 89 (2004) 1043-1047 Empressite, AgTe, from the Empress-Josephine Mine, Colorado, USA: Composition, physical properties, and determination of the crystal structure _database_code_amcsd 0003585 CELL PARAMETERS: 8.901863 20.12094 4.619944 90.00000 90.00000 90.00000 SPACE GROUP: Pmnb X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 823.729 Density (g/cm3): 7.594 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 129.1340665 RIR: 5.537 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 8.93 16.70 10.0605 0 2 0 20.41 1.77 4.3794 1 4 0 22.25 16.19 4.0180 1 1 1 23.51 33.63 3.8047 0 3 1 26.87 33.46 3.3334 2 4 0 28.20 28.29 3.1783 1 4 1 28.57 2.25 3.1382 1 6 0 29.56 2.44 3.0344 0 5 1 31.04 15.33 2.8921 2 3 1 31.26 7.36 2.8722 1 5 1 31.55 9.41 2.8461 3 2 0 33.26 100.00 2.7032 2 4 1 33.58 1.02 2.6784 2 6 0 34.67 7.70 2.5959 1 6 1 35.82 3.54 2.5151 0 8 0 35.93 3.18 2.5072 2 5 1 36.94 4.53 2.4406 0 7 1 37.22 2.58 2.4232 3 2 1 37.26 5.86 2.4204 1 8 0 38.98 22.06 2.3171 2 6 1 39.11 2.82 2.3100 0 0 2 39.37 2.91 2.2949 0 1 2 40.44 5.97 2.2364 3 4 1 40.65 32.94 2.2255 4 0 0 40.71 9.17 2.2222 1 1 2 40.96 7.04 2.2090 0 8 1 41.34 3.65 2.1897 2 8 0 41.45 10.16 2.1841 0 3 2 41.48 1.27 2.1827 1 2 2 42.26 2.49 2.1440 1 8 1 42.34 19.36 2.1400 2 7 1 42.73 3.81 2.1212 1 3 2 42.73 13.61 2.1215 3 5 1 44.28 4.82 2.0503 2 0 2 44.44 1.11 2.0432 1 4 2 44.52 18.80 2.0397 2 1 2 45.17 15.11 2.0121 0 10 0 45.37 2.53 2.0034 0 5 2 46.36 2.90 1.9629 1 9 1 47.43 6.40 1.9210 4 3 1 47.49 6.57 1.9186 3 8 0 49.83 1.14 1.8337 2 9 1 50.80 2.74 1.8006 0 7 2 51.68 2.93 1.7719 3 8 1 52.09 5.33 1.7590 3 3 2 52.28 1.09 1.7531 5 2 0 52.40 2.32 1.7493 2 6 2 55.05 1.70 1.6711 1 8 2 55.11 1.02 1.6692 2 7 2 55.60 2.45 1.6557 5 1 1 55.89 1.43 1.6478 1 12 0 56.01 1.24 1.6444 4 7 1 57.60 1.34 1.6027 4 0 2 58.47 3.14 1.5809 1 9 2 58.66 1.11 1.5761 0 12 1 58.61 3.96 1.5775 5 4 1 58.95 1.88 1.5691 2 12 0 59.00 3.41 1.5678 4 8 1 59.38 4.18 1.5588 4 3 2 60.95 1.73 1.5223 0 2 3 61.35 1.58 1.5131 1 1 3 61.44 1.79 1.5111 2 9 2 62.29 7.78 1.4925 4 10 0 62.46 1.88 1.4889 4 5 2 62.47 3.13 1.4886 5 6 1 63.23 1.44 1.4725 0 4 3 63.47 1.13 1.4676 0 13 1 65.02 1.91 1.4361 2 10 2 65.13 3.52 1.4340 0 11 2 65.69 1.39 1.4230 6 4 0 65.86 2.57 1.4199 1 5 3 66.55 3.92 1.4067 5 1 2 66.92 1.46 1.3998 4 7 2 67.02 1.05 1.3980 2 4 3 68.70 1.78 1.3677 2 14 0 68.86 3.08 1.3649 2 11 2 69.15 5.06 1.3600 6 4 1 70.72 1.38 1.3334 5 9 1 71.97 1.88 1.3133 0 8 3 72.09 4.71 1.3114 2 14 1 72.70 1.49 1.3018 6 6 1 72.92 2.73 1.2984 2 7 3 73.20 3.33 1.2942 3 5 3 74.65 1.04 1.2726 1 13 2 74.98 1.32 1.2678 6 7 1 75.40 1.24 1.2617 7 2 0 75.77 1.24 1.2564 4 2 3 75.83 1.30 1.2555 1 9 3 76.52 1.67 1.2459 6 1 2 78.40 1.18 1.2206 5 12 0 79.58 2.35 1.2054 4 11 2 80.60 2.62 1.1927 5 9 2 81.67 2.41 1.1798 3 13 2 82.25 2.44 1.1729 7 5 1 85.64 1.40 1.1349 7 8 0 85.99 1.63 1.1311 4 8 3 87.76 1.17 1.1127 8 0 0 88.00 1.20 1.1103 2 17 1 89.15 1.47 1.0990 7 3 2 89.15 1.47 1.0990 7 3 2 XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.