Stellerite Diffraction data computed using the structure from the paper listed below, along with the cell parameters refined from the powder pattern R070535. Arletti R, Mazzucato E, Vezzalini G American Mineralogist 91 (2006) 628-634 Influence of dehydration kinetics on T-O-T bridge breaking in zeolites with framework type STI: The case of stellerite Locality: Seremida, Sardinia, Italy Sample: T = 302 K Note: occupancies invented to match formula CELL PARAMETERS: 13.60008 18.22084 17.83150 90.00000 90.00000 90.00000 SPACE GROUP: Fmmm X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L 9.50 1.87 9.2994 1 1 1 9.69 100.00 9.1104 0 2 0 9.91 21.02 8.9157 0 0 2 13.00 1.15 6.8000 2 0 0 13.88 1.59 6.3721 0 2 2 16.25 2.91 5.4494 2 2 0 16.38 7.18 5.4069 2 0 2 16.72 4.12 5.2955 1 3 1 19.07 48.06 4.6497 2 2 2 19.89 3.48 4.4579 0 0 4 20.77 31.25 4.2712 3 1 1 21.90 57.12 4.0549 1 3 3 21.89 12.33 4.0564 0 4 2 22.18 10.40 4.0042 0 2 4 23.84 20.57 3.7282 2 0 4 25.54 9.20 3.4837 2 4 2 26.18 14.27 3.4000 4 0 0 26.27 17.86 3.3895 1 1 5 27.98 16.55 3.1854 4 2 0 27.98 2.01 3.1860 0 4 4 28.06 18.36 3.1769 4 0 2 28.77 12.02 3.0998 3 3 3 29.38 2.11 3.0368 0 6 0 29.46 39.66 3.0287 1 5 3 29.75 25.26 2.9996 1 3 5 29.75 12.64 2.9997 4 2 2 30.04 2.27 2.9719 0 0 6 31.08 1.55 2.8746 0 6 2 31.64 2.76 2.8254 0 2 6 32.25 15.21 2.7729 2 6 0 33.10 10.01 2.7034 4 0 4 34.34 4.37 2.6091 2 2 6 34.38 2.12 2.6057 4 4 2 34.57 1.97 2.5917 4 2 4 34.98 11.53 2.5627 3 5 3 35.23 1.76 2.5450 3 3 5 35.44 1.10 2.5307 1 7 1 35.74 2.24 2.5098 0 6 4 36.05 4.51 2.4890 0 4 6 36.18 2.47 2.4805 1 1 7 36.63 6.02 2.4509 5 1 3 38.19 1.90 2.3545 2 6 4 38.29 1.73 2.3485 1 7 3 38.87 1.46 2.3148 1 3 7 39.73 2.95 2.2667 6 0 0 40.43 1.76 2.2289 0 0 8 40.90 2.79 2.2045 3 1 7 40.99 1.02 2.1996 6 2 0 41.68 1.02 2.1651 0 2 8 42.03 1.71 2.1477 5 1 5 42.52 1.90 2.1240 0 6 6 42.65 1.12 2.1181 2 0 8 43.05 2.46 2.0990 2 8 2 43.34 1.24 2.0857 3 3 7 43.84 2.71 2.0630 2 2 8 43.83 3.29 2.0637 1 5 7 44.22 1.82 2.0465 5 5 3 44.42 7.19 2.0374 5 3 5 44.61 1.66 2.0293 6 4 0 44.64 1.03 2.0282 0 8 4 45.97 1.42 1.9726 6 2 4 47.89 1.18 1.8977 1 9 3 48.04 2.36 1.8923 4 8 0 48.64 1.12 1.8702 5 7 1 48.93 2.20 1.8599 5 5 5 50.01 3.26 1.8221 0 10 0 50.47 1.84 1.8065 3 1 9 50.43 2.10 1.8078 0 8 6 51.18 2.70 1.7831 0 0 10 51.28 2.31 1.7799 6 6 2 51.69 1.49 1.7668 7 3 3 52.64 1.40 1.7372 2 6 8 52.98 1.80 1.7267 2 10 2 53.88 1.35 1.7000 8 0 0 53.93 3.68 1.6987 7 1 5 54.25 1.45 1.6895 3 7 7 54.89 3.01 1.6712 8 2 0 55.16 3.51 1.6635 5 7 5 55.93 1.79 1.6426 8 2 2 57.83 2.57 1.5930 0 8 8 58.01 1.20 1.5884 8 0 4 58.00 4.41 1.5887 4 6 8 58.30 1.64 1.5812 6 8 2 58.94 1.25 1.5656 6 2 8 58.92 1.49 1.5661 1 7 9 59.34 1.37 1.5559 1 3 11 59.34 1.89 1.5560 4 2 10 59.45 1.16 1.5534 0 10 6 59.55 1.51 1.5510 2 8 8 64.54 3.03 1.4425 4 8 8 65.50 1.17 1.4237 9 3 3 65.58 1.23 1.4223 7 5 7 68.06 1.23 1.3763 5 11 3 70.35 1.94 1.3371 8 2 8 70.95 1.16 1.3272 8 6 6 71.71 2.00 1.3151 5 11 5 72.47 1.38 1.3030 4 10 8 72.68 1.84 1.2998 9 5 5 77.16 1.22 1.2352 3 5 13 77.18 1.07 1.2349 8 6 8 83.00 1.15 1.1624 8 8 8 83.00 1.15 1.1624 8 8 8 XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.