The Mineral Evolution database is currently under development.
The goal of this page is to present localities at which the mineral is found, and estimates of the oldest possible geologic age of the minerals at these localities.
This mineral is using an age reported as an element mineralization period.
O
This mineral is using an age calculated from all data at the locality.
R
The age displayed for this mineral originates from a different, non-child locality.
P
The age displayed for this mineral is the range of ages for this mineral at all of this locality's children.
This mineral's age has not yet been recorded.
This Mineral list contains entries from this locality, including sub-localities. Minerals in bold are reported by mindat.org as occurring directly at this locality, and do not occur at any children (sublocalities) of this locality.Elements at this locality, including sub-localities: AlAsBBeBiCCaCeClCuFFeHInKMgMnNaOPSSiSnUZnElements from minerals reported directly at this locality: Structural Groups for minerals in this locality:
Possibility of hydrothermal degassing of lode material around 210 Ma and 215 Ma which overprints a primary formation age of roughly 270 Ma. New mineral growth may have occurred close to 165 Ma with further hydrothermal activity at about 100 Ma. Adularia from veins in the Lizard Complex also provides indication
Using Pockleys Interpretations, it is acceptable to say that South Terras, Geevor, and Wheal Owles are not reliable indications of Tertiary mineralization.
Using Pockleys Interpretations, it is acceptable to say that South Terras, Geevor, and Wheal Owles are not reliable indications of Tertiary mineralization.
Using Pockleys Interpretations, it is acceptable to say that South Terras, Geevor, and Wheal Owles are not reliable indications of Tertiary mineralization.
The only firm conclusion about the uraninite mineralization at Geevor is that some of it must be older than 290 My. and some of it must be younger than 223 My.
The figure of 290 My. originally obtained from Geevor (Darnley et al., 1960), and the figure of 223 My. given here, may be mean ages of uraninite from different sections of the mine. However, from consideration of other results from the region it is likely that the figure of 290 My. is not far below the maximum age at which mineralization could have occurred.